What Isthe Intent of Davis-Bacon Act: Aninference By Means of Cluster Statistical Method?
Abstract
The Davis-Bacon Actwaspassed in 1931, Armond Thieblot (1975) put forward a new point of view, i.e. at least in part, the Davis-Bacon Act was motivated by racial bigotry. Thieblot’s point of view resulted in controversy, formed a bipartisan view, and is still in dispute.This article uses clustering statistical method to cluster the data on the occupational status of the Whites and the Blacks of construction industry of Virginia in 1909, 1910, 1911, 1920, and 1928, divides the occupational status of the Whites and the Blacks of construction industryinto fivegroups, then, the characteristics of these five occupational groupshave been analyzed, further, the relationship between the Whites & the Blacks’ employment rate and average wage level in these five occupational groups have been studied. The study shows that the change in wage levels is not a means to control the employment rate of the Black, and it is inferred that the intent for the enacting of the Davis-Bacon Act is not out of racial bigotry, but of job protection under the premise of maintaining existing local standards.
Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.15640/jeds.v8n2a2
Abstract
The Davis-Bacon Actwaspassed in 1931, Armond Thieblot (1975) put forward a new point of view, i.e. at least in part, the Davis-Bacon Act was motivated by racial bigotry. Thieblot’s point of view resulted in controversy, formed a bipartisan view, and is still in dispute.This article uses clustering statistical method to cluster the data on the occupational status of the Whites and the Blacks of construction industry of Virginia in 1909, 1910, 1911, 1920, and 1928, divides the occupational status of the Whites and the Blacks of construction industryinto fivegroups, then, the characteristics of these five occupational groupshave been analyzed, further, the relationship between the Whites & the Blacks’ employment rate and average wage level in these five occupational groups have been studied. The study shows that the change in wage levels is not a means to control the employment rate of the Black, and it is inferred that the intent for the enacting of the Davis-Bacon Act is not out of racial bigotry, but of job protection under the premise of maintaining existing local standards.
Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.15640/jeds.v8n2a2
Browse Journals
Journal Policies
Information
Useful Links
- Call for Papers
- Submit Your Paper
- Publish in Your Native Language
- Subscribe the Journal
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Contact the Executive Editor
- Recommend this Journal to Librarian
- View the Current Issue
- View the Previous Issues
- Recommend this Journal to Friends
- Recommend a Special Issue
- Comment on the Journal
- Publish the Conference Proceedings
Latest Activities
Resources
Visiting Status
Today | 99 |
Yesterday | 141 |
This Month | 409 |
Last Month | 12006 |
All Days | 1902602 |
Online | 5 |